The music industry stands at a crossroads we've seen before—but never quite like this.

When streaming arrived, we adapted. When social media changed how artists connect with fans, we evolved. Now artificial intelligence has arrived, and the question everyone's asking is whether it's here to destroy, assist, or revolutionise what we do.

The answer is more complex than any single label can capture. At Artist Republic, we've watched this transformation unfold from the ground level—working with musicians who face these challenges daily. What we've learnt is that AI isn't simply a threat, tool, or opportunity.

It's all three, simultaneously.

‍

‍

The Volume Crisis Nobody's Prepared For

Here's a number that should make every artist pause: Deezer now receives over 60,000 fully AI-generated tracks every single day.

That's 39% of all music delivered to the platform daily.

Suno generates a Spotify catalogue's worth of music every two weeks. The democratisation we've championed for years—giving every musician access to distribution—has created an unexpected consequence. The flood isn't just rising. It's already here.

For independent artists without major label backing, this creates a brutal paradox. The barriers to creating music have never been lower. The barriers to being heard have never been higher.

We're drowning in content whilst starving for connection.

‍

‍

The Copyright Minefield

The legal landscape around AI-generated music reads like a thriller with no ending yet written.

Suno's own terms of service contain a remarkable admission: "Due to the nature of machine learning, Suno makes no representation or warranty to you that any copyright will vest in any Output." The company creating the music can't promise you'll own what you've generated.

The situation became clearer—and more challenging—in March 2025. The US Court of Appeals issued a landmark ruling denying copyright protection for AI-generated works. The message is unambiguous: works created entirely by artificial intelligence cannot be owned under copyright law.

Human authorship remains the cornerstone.

For musicians, this creates a minefield. You need to prove substantial human contribution to secure protection. The line between "AI-assisted" and "AI-generated" becomes the difference between owning your work and owning nothing at all.

Commercial models haven't disclosed their training datasets or model details. Because neural networks internalise statistical patterns rather than storing training songs, detecting whether particular pieces were used to train a model is nearly impossible. When AI companies can delete their training data, audits become futile.

This opacity creates profound trust issues that demand solutions we haven't built yet.

‍

‍

From Litigation to Collaboration

The industry's response has been fascinating to watch.

2024 was the year major music companies filed lawsuits against the biggest AI music developers. 2025 represents something different—the first steps toward legitimisation.

Udio was sued by the three major music companies in summer 2024. By late 2025, they'd reached a settlement with Universal. The terms tell you everything about where this is heading: Udio agreed to pivot away from creating new songs with simple prompts. They're becoming a fully-licenced music remixing and fan engagement platform instead.

The industry chose adaptation over resistance.

This shift matters because it signals a recognition that AI isn't going away. The question becomes how we shape its integration rather than whether we accept its existence.

‍

‍

The Uneven Impact Across Genres

Not all music faces the same threat level.

Two-thirds of music professionals believe EDM and mainstream pop will prove amenable to AI generation and replication. Half expect ambient and functional music to follow. The patterns are learnable. The structures are replicable.

Jazz, blues, and classical music sit at the opposite end. The subtlety and nuance of human interaction in these genres create barriers AI hasn't overcome. The improvisational conversation between musicians, the emotional weight carried in a bent note, the cultural context embedded in every phrase—these elements resist algorithmic reproduction.

For now.

This creates genre-specific implications. Artists working in electronic and pop spaces need different strategies than those in jazz or classical. The toolkit for navigating AI's impact isn't universal.

‍

‍

The Creativity Question

Carnegie Mellon University conducted research that revealed something unexpected about AI-assisted music.

It was slower. It used fewer notes. Listeners judged it as less creative.

Yet here's the paradox: 82% of listeners find it difficult to tell the difference between music created by AI and pieces composed by humans.

The technical proficiency exists. The creative spark remains distinctly human. But audiences don't always perceive the difference.

This matters because it challenges our assumptions about what makes music valuable. If listeners can't distinguish between human and AI creation, does the origin matter? Or do we need to reframe how we communicate the value of human artistry?

‍

‍

New Revenue Streams Taking Shape

Spotify's Co-CEO Gustav Söderström outlined a vision that should interest every artist: "Everything we see tells us listeners want to interact with their favourite music and many artists want to let them, creating new revenue from their existing catalogue."

The platform claims the technology is ready to unlock this "in a way that is additive for both IP rightsholders and Spotify."

Warner Music Group CEO Robert Kyncl went further. He told analysts that "superfan tiers of the future will all include AI functionality to create," describing creation as "the ultimate expression of fandom."

This vision positions AI-powered fan engagement as a significant new monetisation opportunity. Fans don't just listen—they remix, they create derivatives, they participate in the creative process.

The question is whether this creates genuine value for artists or simply another revenue stream that flows primarily to platforms and labels.

‍

‍

The Power Shift

Half of Spotify's royalties went to independent artists last year.

That's a remarkable statistic that demonstrates how the industry has shifted. But it masks a deeper complexity about AI's impact on power dynamics.

Independent musicians face a particularly precarious position. Without the leverage of major labels, they find their work included in training datasets with minimal compensation. They're simultaneously shut out of lucrative licencing deals that favour major label artists.

AI could accelerate the consolidation of power in the music industry. The technology might reinforce traditional hierarchies rather than disrupting them.

This dual reality shows AI can both empower and marginalise independent creators depending on how the industry evolves. The outcome isn't predetermined. It depends on the structures we build.

‍

‍

The Tools That Level the Playing Field

BandLab's automated mastering reaches over 40 million users, many without formal audio engineering training.

Their 2022 user survey revealed that 65% of independent artists using AI mastering reported increased streaming engagement. The technology levels the playing field for musicians without access to professional studios.

Berklee music experts emphasise that AI is already reshaping the creative economy. For artists willing to engage with this technology, it opens new ways to lead.

One expert noted: "I've seen a number of so-called disruptive technologies come along. And for me, they've created a lot of opportunity. In my experience, more growth comes from these things."

This perspective reframes the conversation from threat to opportunity. The musicians who adapt fastest gain competitive advantages.

Jobs Won't Disappear—They'll Transform

The future of music industry roles looks different, not extinct.

A music producer becomes more of a creative director, guiding AI tools rather than manually adjusting every parameter. An A&R scout needs data analysis skills alongside talent spotting instincts. An artist must understand how to licence their voice and data for AI training.

Adaptability becomes the key to career success in the new music industry.

This evolution mirrors what we've seen with previous technological shifts. The roles changed. The skills required shifted. But the fundamental need for human judgement, taste, and creative vision remained.

What We're Building at Artist Republic

We're not waiting to see how this plays out.

At Artist Republic, we believe in making the world a better place through action. That means helping the musicians we work with navigate this transformation with clear eyes and practical strategies.

We're building systems that help artists understand which AI tools enhance their creative process without compromising their artistic identity. We're creating frameworks for protecting intellectual property in an era where copyright law struggles to keep pace with technology.

We're having conversations about how to use AI for the tedious parts of music production—mixing, mastering, administrative tasks—whilst preserving the human elements that make music resonate emotionally.

Our reach is international, but our work is grounded in authenticity.

We've supported musicians from grassroots street performances in Europe to festivals in the Middle East. What we've learnt is that AI's impact varies dramatically based on genre, audience, and an artist's existing infrastructure.

There's no universal playbook. But there are principles that guide smart decision-making.

The Principles That Matter

First, understand that AI is a tool, not a replacement. The musicians who thrive will use AI to handle repetitive tasks whilst focusing their creative energy on the elements that require human insight.

Second, protect your work aggressively. Document your creative process. Ensure substantial human contribution to everything you release. The legal landscape favours those who can prove human authorship.

Third, stay informed about licencing agreements. Read the terms. Understand what rights you're granting when you use AI platforms. The convenience of these tools can mask significant long-term implications.

Fourth, experiment strategically. AI offers capabilities that didn't exist five years ago. Musicians who ignore these tools entirely risk falling behind. But adoption should be thoughtful, not reactive.

Fifth, maintain your artistic identity. AI can mimic styles and generate content, but it can't replicate the lived experience that informs genuine artistic expression. Your perspective remains your competitive advantage.

The Path Forward

The AI in Music Market is expected to reach USD 60.4 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 27.8%.

The transformation is accelerating, not slowing down.

The global recorded music industry has more than doubled since 2014, from US$14 billion to US$29.6 billion. Streaming now accounts for 69% of revenue. Technology-driven disruption creates both peril and possibility.

We've navigated these transitions before. The shift to digital. The rise of streaming. The democratisation of distribution. Each time, the industry adapted. Each time, musicians who understood the changes early gained advantages.

This moment is no different in principle. But it's different in scale and speed.

At Artist Republic, we're not content to just do the job. We constantly challenge ourselves to innovate, to stay ahead of industry shifts, to build the infrastructure our artists need to thrive in whatever landscape emerges.

We're builders. We build relationships. We build systems. We build careers.

And right now, we're building through the storm rather than hiding from it.

The musicians we work with aren't waiting for clarity. They're creating it. They're experimenting with AI tools whilst maintaining their artistic integrity. They're protecting their work whilst exploring new revenue streams. They're adapting without abandoning what makes their music distinctly human.

This is how you navigate uncertainty. You move forward with clear principles, practical strategies, and the recognition that standing still is the only guaranteed way to fall behind.

AI in music is threat, tool, and opportunity. The question isn't which label fits best. The question is how you respond to all three simultaneously.

Welcome to the future. Where music still works—just differently than before.